In the opening chapter of Rob Bell’s provocative book, Velvet Elvis, the author relates a story about a piece of art he purchased several decades ago – a rendering of Elvis Presley on velvet. You’ve seen them displayed at those classy road-side markets I’m sure.
Bell describes his treasure in detail and identifies the artist as someone using a simple signature stroke – the letter “R” He confesses the piece no longer hangs anywhere in his home; it was long ago moved to the basement, stored behind some old boxes and shelving. The art has lost its appeal and it clashes with the home’s contemporary décor.
He poses an intriguing question in regard the Elvis masterpiece: What if, upon completion of the Velvet Elvis, “R” insisted that no one else could paint another image of Elvis? His velvet Elvis would stand as the consummate portrayal of the singer; his rendering would be the official expression of the entertaining legend.
The matter for all of us to consider has do do with our eccleseastical Velvet Elvis creations. Are we sometimes guilty of obstructing new expressions of the presence and power of Jesus Christ, as well as innovative methods of ministry and outreach? The question becomes: does “our way” adequately express the fullness of Jesus Christ, or does the task necessitate innovation and diversity?
He poses an intriguing question in regard the Elvis masterpiece: What if, upon completion of the Velvet Elvis, “R” insisted that no one else could paint another image of Elvis? His velvet Elvis would stand as the consummate portrayal of the singer; his rendering would be the official expression of the entertaining legend.
The matter for all of us to consider has do do with our eccleseastical Velvet Elvis creations. Are we sometimes guilty of obstructing new expressions of the presence and power of Jesus Christ, as well as innovative methods of ministry and outreach? The question becomes: does “our way” adequately express the fullness of Jesus Christ, or does the task necessitate innovation and diversity?
I’m sure we all agree that Elvis was far too large a personality to be defined by a single artist’s rendering. The inexhaustible inventory of Elvis memorabilia suggests there are still unexplored aspects of his personality and career – people want to know more about “the king.” On the other hand, maybe “R” was the real deal and he captured the true Elvis mystique once and for all. No one else should ever try.
Does the world sometimes view our expression of church in the same manner we might judge Rob Bell’s musty old Velvet Elvis – stale and outdated? Do we regard our demonstration of the Lord’s church as the decisive work, our methods anointed? Is our not so subtle message, “don’t even think about painting outside the lines?”
For the church to complete the mission of reaching the world with the Kingdom message – it may well be necessary to paint outside the lines drawn by previous generations. We rightly perceive that our culture is shifting rapidly, but ignore the task of clearly conversing with it. A call is going forth… a call for creative and innovative expression to be released within the church.
Does the world sometimes view our expression of church in the same manner we might judge Rob Bell’s musty old Velvet Elvis – stale and outdated? Do we regard our demonstration of the Lord’s church as the decisive work, our methods anointed? Is our not so subtle message, “don’t even think about painting outside the lines?”
For the church to complete the mission of reaching the world with the Kingdom message – it may well be necessary to paint outside the lines drawn by previous generations. We rightly perceive that our culture is shifting rapidly, but ignore the task of clearly conversing with it. A call is going forth… a call for creative and innovative expression to be released within the church.
The Book of Acts announces the Holy Spirit as the divine companion who enables believers to be effective witnesses – that means “communicate” not “maintain.” The former requires imagination; the latter control. Is the church missing divine opportunities to witness for the sake of maintaining ancient tradition? Will future generations view our impact as marginal -- might someone say of us, “They were out of touch -- one dimensional and irrelevant?
It is likely that every generation walks with a certain degree of ecclesiastical arrogance, convinced their expression of worship and their concept of mission embodies the plan and purpose of God. Over the centuries that perspective has tainted the church’s integrity and hindered her mission.
It is likely that every generation walks with a certain degree of ecclesiastical arrogance, convinced their expression of worship and their concept of mission embodies the plan and purpose of God. Over the centuries that perspective has tainted the church’s integrity and hindered her mission.
By every testimony, God has called us to bold and courageous acts of service. Our creative and imaginative God is asking us to unshackle and release His creative and innovative presence within the church. Ministers are called to commission believers to creatively paint with bold strokes of inspired imagination. Yes, for heaven’s sake, even paint outside those familiar lines!
.jpg)